CONTACT US  SUBSCRIBER SERVICES  LETTER TO THE EDITOR  BUY! PHOTOS  EMAIL UPDATES

Advertisement

ARCHIVE SEARCH


Advanced Search

ARCHIVES



MARKETPLACE

Place an ad
in print and online, 24/7





Advertisement



ARCHIVES

Email a friend feed Printer friendly

Spay-neuter ordinance provokes a big howl

The first showdown between supporters and opponents of a law that would mandate spaying and neutering for cats and dogs was expectedly heated Tuesday at the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors meeting.

Right off the top, county staff jumped in with rebuttals to expected claims from opponents that similar laws in other counties have not decreased animal-shelter overcrowding and have increased enforcement costs.

“Spay-and-neuter ordinances have worked in Santa Cruz and San Mateo counties,” said Michele Mickiewicz, county public health interim deputy director, at the outset of the two-hour hearing in Santa Barbara.

And any additional costs concerned salary adjustments and were unrelated to ordinance enforcement, she added.

Despite the staffs’ precautions, many people disputed these claims, and argued that not only have such ordinances proven ineffective and expensive in other communities, they also punish responsible pet owners.

However, there were many if not more people who declared that the ordinance would provide welcome weight behind efforts to alter unsupervised pets.

A representative of Catalyst for Cats, an organization that aims to humanely trap, neuter and release feral felines, said volunteers often offer free alterations, but if owners refuse, there is no recourse.

Advertisement

A spay-and-neuter ordinance would add some bite to their bark, animal shelter volunteers said Tuesday.

No decisions will be made until North County residents also have had a chance — on Nov. 10 — to weigh in on the controversial topic, Supervisor Joe Centeno said.

Also, each speaker gets only one chance to weigh in, so those who commented Tuesday were asked to hold their peace next week.

The proposed amendments to the county’s dog-licensing ordinance allow owners, who have a certificate from their veterinarian, to purchase an unaltered animal license and save their pets from being spayed or neutered.

Otherwise, “for every owner in the county who owns a dog or cat over six months of age ... the own-er shall have the dog or

cat spayed or neutered,” the proposed ordinance states.

County animal shelters and volunteer organizations have been over-burdened with the number of homeless animals for years, and the solution is to build new facilities, euthanize more animals or stop animals from producing unwanted litters, Mickiewicz said.

In this case, a spay-and-neuter ordinance, which includes an out for responsible pet owners, fits the county’s resources best, she added.

County staff said an 11-member volunteer task force also sent the Board of Supervisors a recommendation to implement a pilot program that encompasses increased outreach and education to achieve a higher rate of dog and cat licensing compliance.

There is also a hope of opening the door to grant funding in order to begin low- or no-cost spay-and-neuter clinics through county animal services.

The Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors meets at 9 a.m.

Nov. 10 at the Betteravia Government Center at 511 E. Lakeside Parkway in Santa Maria.

For more information visit countyofsb.org.


POST A COMMENT

Comment policy:
SYVNews.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. We will never edit or alter your comments, but we do reserve the right to remove comments that violate our code of conduct. No comment may contain:

  • Potentially libelous statements; such as accusing somebody of a crime, defamation of character, or statements that can harm somebody's reputation.
  • Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
  • Personal attacks, insults, threats, harassment or inciting violence.
  • Commercial product promotions.

Please view our Commenting Policy

If you have any questions, please contact our moderator.
Click here to report offensive or inappropriate comments.

 
(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

2 comment(s)

Jean Greek DVM wrote on Nov 8, 2009 3:06 PM:

" As a point of clarification, this bill would not mandate spaying and neutering although it would encourage responsible pet ownership. Owners wishing not to have their dogs altered can get a waiver and pay a slightly higher licensing fee. The opposition to this ordinance is referring to it as mandating spay or neuter in an attempt to fan hysteria. Interestingly, most of the opposition seems to have come from outside of our county and consist of breeders, who would not be affected by this ordinance. Support seems to be from shelter workers and volunteers who are distressed by the killing of unwanted pets. "

Gordon wrote on Nov 18, 2009 9:33 AM:

" How nice for the vets, the law Dr. Greek sugars up and claims does not mandate castration or hysterectomies for the pets, so no income from that but Dr. Fararo (one of the leaders of the Supervisors committee) assured they'd get income by making it mandatory that, if you do not spay or neuter you have to PAY the vets to excuse you. Hmmm, who is reaping the benefits from this? Vets for surgery or for excusing you and the Shelter who will get added tax dollars. Who loses, the responsible citizens of Santa Barbara. "





SEARCH ARTICLE ARCHIVES

  
Advanced Search





Translate to another language

Lee Central Coast Newspapers

Santa Maria Times Lompoc Record Times Press Recorder Adobe Press Santa Ynez Valley News El Tiempo

Letter to the Editor | Comment about Website

Contact The Santa Ynez Valley News
Main Phone: 805-688-5522

Copyright © 2010 Lee Central Coast Newspapers. All Rights Reserved.
All Lee Central Coast Newspapers pages are designed for Firefox 2.0 and Internet Explorer 6 or 7 with screen resolutions set at 1024x768 or higher.
Click here for our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use applicable to this site.